Trump hits dead end at U.S. Supreme Court

9F083E56-4F39-415C-AB95-B28549E940B5

Twitter suspends account permanently

Donald Trump : finally hits the end of the road at Supreme Court

U.S. President Donald Trump has finally reached the end of the road with his ploy to upturn the results of the November election, dismissed by the Supreme Court.

In a short ruling on Friday, the Court refused to let Texas challenge the election results in four battleground states critical to Trump’s defeat at the polls last month, finally sealing his political fate.

“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections,” the court said in a brief order.

It dismissed all other related claims as moot.

Trump backed by many Republican lawmakers and 17 states, had joined the Texas suit as a plaintiff.

But he has now seen the futility of his efforts to upturn Biden’s victory.

The justices’ action clears the way for electors to convene in 50 states and the District of Columbia Monday and all but confirm that President-elect Joe Biden will be the nation’s 46th president.

Texas had made, and Trump had endorsed, an 11th-hour effort to have the nation’s highest court block Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin from casting their electoral votes for Biden Monday.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton claimed the four states used the coronavirus pandemic as a pretext to change election rules and greatly expand mail voting in violation of the Constitution.

Related News

Within days, the last-ditch challenge had erupted into a war involving nearly every state in the nation.

The four battleground states fired back, with Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro labelling the effort to negate millions of citizens’ ballots a “seditious abuse of the judicial process.”

“Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states for yielding results with which it disagrees,” Shapiro told the justices in legal papers.

“Its request for this court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred candidate for president is legally indefensible and is an affront to principles of constitutional democracy.”

The effort was a long shot for several reasons.

States run their own elections, making it a violation of sovereignty for Texas to interfere with other states’ procedures.

Federal law defers to states in choosing electors, and Congress ultimately counts the votes.

*With reports by USA Today via Yahoo

Load more