
Trump: scam case ongoing in New York
By Agency Reporter
A lawyer for Donald Trump on Tuesday urged a federal appeals court to halt a lawsuit accusing the U.S. president of exploiting his family name to promote a marketing scam targeting poor and working-class people.
The lawyer, Thomas McCarthy, told the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan the plaintiffs were “done in by the allegations of their own complaint,” and that their proposed class action concerning the multi-level marketing company American Communications Network belonged in arbitration.
Four plaintiffs, including a hospice worker, accused Trump, his adult children Donald Jr., Eric and Ivanka and an affiliate of their family company of promoting ACN in exchange for millions of dollars in secret payments from 2005 to 2015.
The plaintiffs said ACN charged $499 to sell videophones and other goods, and the Trump family conned them into thinking Donald Trump believed their investments would pay off.
Trump and his children have called the civil lawsuit, one of many against the president, politically motivated, saying they had no control over ACN and that Trump’s endorsement was merely his opinion.
Some defendants prefer arbitration to litigation because evidence can be harder to come by, costs can be lower, and proceedings are often confidential.
U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield refused in April to send the ACN case to arbitration, saying the plaintiffs had no reason to believe their arbitration agreements with ACN covered the Trumps.
In Tuesday’s arguments before a three-judge panel, Circuit Judge Denny Chin appeared to agree with Schofield’s conclusion that it was unfair for the Trumps to demand arbitration only after she had dismissed a racketeering claim.
“You waited eight months before asking to compel arbitration,” Chin told McCarthy. “You requested and obtained substantive relief … In those circumstances, why isn’t the right to arbitration, to the extent it exists, waived?”
McCarthy responded that the claims against the Trumps and ACN were intertwined, that only “minimal” time had passed, and that the lawsuit was still in its early stages.
Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, countered that arbitration is “fundamentally a matter of consent,” and that her clients never expected to battle the Trumps in arbitration.
“This is a fraud case,” she said. “This is about what Donald Trump said.”
The case is Doe et al v Trump Corp et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Nos. 20-1228, 20-1278.
Join The Conversation
You May Like
Latest
Edo Judge charges journalists on objective reportage
Sanwo-Olu promises not to neglect Lagos identity
Sanwo-Olu commissions Glover memorial hall (Photos)
Buhari’s declaration of no-fly zone in Zamfara in order – Matawalle
Lagos seeks private investors for feedlots establishment
Covid-19: LG administration can’t be the same again – Obaseki
Senate wades into abandoned Badagry-Sokoto Expressway project
Obaseki’s a liar, our strike not politically motivated – Edo NUT
Buhari condoles with Gov. Bagudu over brother’s death
Senate amends law to accommodate Lafia Teaching Hospital
All 279 Jangebe schoolgirls are medically okay – Commissioner
Flush the bad eggs, Ex-senator tells Fulani herdsmen
2 fraudsters convicted, forfeit luxury cars in Abeokuta
Fake NSCDC officer bags 7 years imprisonment
Fears of epidemic in Ogun secretariat over collapse of sewage system
PHCN Benefit Scam: Ex-BPE DG, granted N1bn bail
NDDC to begin construction of Imo-Rivers road
Breaking: #EndSARS protesters stole $2m, N17m from my palace – Akiolu
PDP expels former governorship candidate, Aminu Ibrahim
Maryam Abu Shinga, Kano fraudster to refund N110m to victims
Apapa gridlock: We will fight, name, shame saboteurs – Sanwo-Olu