24th January, 2011
Over the years, completion of several rural projects awarded to contractors in Lagos State, southwest Nigeria, was always delayed due to several factors. Some of the factors could be attributed to inclement weather conditions and improper funding, among others.
The need to fashion out new strategies for effective and timely project delivery in rural projects led to the convocation of a one-day stakeholders’ workshop on: Contractor Financed Option for Project Implementation/Provision of Infrastructure in Rural Areas in Lagos State.
The workshop, held at the Conference Room, Lagos State Environmental Protection Agency, LASEPA drew contractors from the private sector and experts in project administration and execution across the state. The workshop was put together by the Lagos State Ministry of Rural Development.
“The driving force behind organizing the workshop is our desire to introduce new strategies with the hope of achieving new and better results and improved service delivery.
“The general call on Ministry, Department and Agency, MDAs is to improve with the aim of lifting the target of 90 per cent overall budget performance. Obviously, issues such as procurement method, funding, project financing and management are critical to improved budget performance,†said Engr. Babatunde Oshodi, Permanent Secretary, Lagos State Ministry of Rural Development.
“Over the years, attempts at taking advantage of dry weather period which in Nigeria falls between November and April had not yielded much. As a matter of fact, by our traditional procurement and funding method, most contracts commenced in the middle of the rainy season.
“Most time, contractors collect down payment from government and sit at home waiting for the rains to subside. Price increase occurs in some cases between the time contractor collects advance payment and when the rain subsides, leading to variation controversies,†he added.
According to him, the major works executed by the rural ministry in a bid to stem rural-urban drift were provision of water and sanitation facilities; rural electrification, solar light, opening of rural roads, rehabilitation and construction of rural roads, among others.
He said with proper funding and sustained project execution, no rural projects should require more than 12 weeks before completion, adding that the implication was that if projects commenced in February of any year, they should be completed before the rains comes in May.
“Effective quality time delivery of projects within dry weather period is the goal of this workshop,†he stated.
Commissioner for Rural Development, Prince Lanre Balogun, disclosed that the concept to ensure that contractors delivered projects awarded to them on time started some years back, adding that “that is why we introduced Rural Development Infrastructural Partnership programme; it is a way to sensitize the citizenry, especially those that are resident in Lagos.
“It is to also look at the source of their income and where a large part of their income is being generated and for them to also give back to the society in terms of corporate social responsibility.
“We realised that majority of the companies are giving back to the community in terms of providing community halls, boreholes, healthcare delivery and other basic facilities to the people. Very soon, an executive bill will be forwarded to the House of Assembly, in a manner that before any organisation within and outside the state provides any facility to Lagosians, they must link up with the agency involved with that statutory responsibility so that they can synchronise what the government is doing and what areas they will like to intervene,†he stated.
According to him, “what it means is that you cannot erect any borehole, without knowing what the plan of the government is. The project is to sensitize the citizen in a manner that they will actually assist in delivering their own corporate social responsibility in relation with the amount of income they are making from that particular area. You cannot make money from Lagos and invest it in other states.
“It is a development of what we did before. Here, we are not talking about corporate social responsibility; we are talking about partnership in a manner that companies in the state can satisfy their own corporate existence. What we want is that companies in the state should walk along with the state government in a manner that we will all deliver the projects together.â€
Delivering a paper on, Health and Safety Management: A Strategic Tool for Enhancing Operational Excellence in Infrastructural Projects, Engr. Jamiu Badmos, Managing Consultant, Finsbury Heinz Limited disclosed that the International Labour Organisation, ILO, estimated at least 60,000 fatal accidents a year on construction sites around the world, adding that “that is one in six of all fatal work-related accidents.â€
“The global trade union federation puts the figure much higher at 108,000 with construction responsible for 30% of all work related accidents. Successful infrastructure project outcomes are contingent upon robust risk management practices that support the realisation of project objectives and future benefits in the most sustainable and economically efficient manner,†he said.
He noted that some universal requirements of good health and safety practice included that “the work place is subject to regular risk assessment; actions are taken to mitigate the major risks; a trained and qualified site safety officer is appointed at with responsibility for maintaining safety; workers receive information, instructions and training with regard to the risks they may be exposed to and appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is provided to all workers free of charge.
“Others are facilities are provided on site for first aid and emergency medical treatment in the event of an accident; accidents, incidents and near misses are recorded and reported to relevant authorities and Health and Safety meetings should be conducted in line with the Health and Safety Plan.â€
On risk assessment in work places, he said hazards needed to be identified; decide who and what might be harmed; evaluate and control risks; record findings and implement them and review and update assessment if necessary
Badmos identified common risk assessment failures to include “carrying out a risk assessment to attempt to justify a decision that’s already been made; using a generic assessment when a site-specific assessment is needed; only considering the risk from one activity; not involving a team of people in the assessment or not including employees with practical knowledge of the process/activity being assessed, among others.