28th July, 2016
Justice Ipaye gave the bashing while hearing a criminal charge filed by the EFCC against a business woman, Mrs Moji Yakubu, her company, Monan Trading Company and nine persons over alleged N800 million land theft charge.
The commission had alleged that Yakubu and her co-defendants had conspired to steal about 10 hectares of land located at Sangotedo, Lagos, Southwest Nigeria.
During the defendant’s formal arraignment in February this year, the judge had raised the issue on whether land could be stolen and asked the EFCC counsel to address her on the matter.
While the matter was slated for ruling, the EFCC lawyer went before another judge, Justice Aishat Opensanwo and obtained a forfeiture order to temporary seal an ongoing project by Monan Trading Company on the 10 hectare land.
When the matter came up on Thursday, Justice Ipaye informed parties that the ruling was not quite ready and that the matter would be adjourned till September.
Counsel to the defendant, Mr Yemi Adeshina, however, drew the attention of the judge to the forfeiture order allegedly obtained by the EFCC against his client.
He told the court that the order amounted to window shopping by the EFCC and should be immediately set aside.
When asked by the judge if the allegation by Adeshina was true, EFCC lawyer, Sonaiki confirmed that he had actually gone before Justice Opesanwo to obtain the temporary forfeiture order.
The judge immediately blasted Shonoiki for going before another court to obtain such order when the matter was still pending before her court.
Justice Ipaye noted that it appeared that the EFCC was poised on taking the law into its hand by such ‘window shopping.’
Ipaye noted that the action of the EFCC lawyer was in bad taste and capable of giving the commission a bad name.
Addressing the EFCC Lawyer, Ipaye said: “It appears that you are keen on taking the laws into your hand. Why would you go before another court for this kind of order when the matter is before me? This kind of action is what is giving the judiciary a bad name.”
In a shot ruling, Justice Ipaye said she would institute a disciplinary action against the EFCC lawyer before the appropriate authority.
She subsequently adjourned the matter till 14 September, 2016 for ruling on the defendant’s application to set aside the forfeiture order and on whether land was capable of being stolen as contained in the EFCC charge.