North and South Korea resume 60-year shouting match

South Korea, North Korea, Speakers

loudspeakers deliver high-decibel threats and taunts goes back to the 1950-53 Korean War, when mobile units with mounted megaphones would try to keep pace with the conflict's rapidly and wildly shifting frontline (AFP Photo/Kim Jae-Hwan)

The use of loudspeakers to deliver high-decibel threats and taunts goes back to the 1950-53 Korean War, when mobile units with mounted megaphones would try to keep pace with the conflict's rapidly and wildly shifting frontline (AFP Photo/Kim Jae-Hwan)
The use of loudspeakers to deliver high-decibel threats and taunts goes back to the 1950-53 Korean War, when mobile units with mounted megaphones would try to keep pace with the conflict’s rapidly and wildly shifting frontline (AFP Photo/Kim Jae-Hwan)

In a modern, high-tech world of sophisticated, subliminal messaging, screaming taunting messages over banks of loudspeakers seems like a decidedly old-school style of propaganda.

Retro or not, it has proved effective enough to prompt North Korea to threaten war if South Korea does not switch off the speakers it recently dusted off and retrieved from the military attic to harangue its rival across the border.

The use of loudspeakers to deliver high-decibel threats and taunts goes back to the 1950-53 Korean War, when mobile units with mounted megaphones would try to keep pace with the conflict’s rapidly and wildly shifting frontline.

In his book, “Cease Resistance: It’s Good for You,” Stanley Sandler, a historian for the US Army Special Operations Command, noted that the messages blasting out from North Korean propaganda units were about as sophisticated as their equipment.

“You have expended all your left-over equipment from World War II. It will start costing you to continue,” was one less-than-morale-shattering effort aimed at US troops.

After the war cemented the division of the Korean peninsula, North and South continued the loudspeaker battle, mixing it up with radio broadcasts and aerial leafleting.

– Changing themes –

The themes favoured by both sides were initially quite similar — the iniquities of their respective socialist and capitalist systems, the mendacity of their respective leaders and the comforts to be found on their respective sides of the border.

In the 1980s and 90s when the South Korean economy really took off, the message from the South changed as it increasingly trumpeted its success and affluence, while the North struggled with hunger and deprivation.

With the election of Kim Dae-Jung as South Korean president in 1998, the content changed again, as Kim’s “Sunshine Policy” of engagement with the North brought in a softer tone.

A former South Korean conscript of the time, who saw out his two-year military service with a border propaganda unit, said the daily diet was largely titbits of news and pop songs — old and new.

In many ways, he recalled, the main priority was just to make some noise.

“We used to broadcast for 15 hours throughout the night into the following morning,” the former soldier, who declined to be identified, told AFP.

South Korean soldier checks the propaganda loudspeakers along the border with North Korea, in Paju (AFP Photo/Kim Jae-Hwan)
South Korean soldier checks the propaganda loudspeakers along the border with North Korea, in Paju (AFP Photo/Kim Jae-Hwan)

– Football propaganda –

Another military official recalled how commentary on some of the matches during the 2002 World Cup — co-hosted by South Korea and Japan — was broadcast live over the speakers to North Korean military units.

Related News

“When we asked them through the loudspeakers whether they enjoyed it, we could see some signalling back their approval — waving their arms in circles,” the official told online news provider Media Today.

A single battery of loudspeakers could stand as much as 10 metres (30 feet) high, with 70-80 units piled on top of each other.

“The impact was greater than you may expect,” said Ju Seung-Young, a former North Korean soldier assigned to a unit on the western front before he defected to the South in 2002.

“The South Korean loudspeakers were a rare source for news about the outside world,” Ju told the Dong-A Ilbo newspaper.

“At first, I thought their broadcasts were all lies. But after being exposed for two years straight, I began to believe it,” he added.

Although the South’s loudspeaker units were about 4.5 kilometres (three miles) away, Ju said the messages could be clearly heard.

By contrast, the North Korean propaganda unit Ju was assigned to had poor equipment and suffered constant power shortages that made it impossible to compete with the South’s powerful output.

– Speakers fall silent –

Military guard posts of South Korea (bottom) and North Korea (top) stand opposite each other as seen from the border town of Paju, on August 21, 2015 (AFP Photo:Jung Yeon-Je)
Military guard posts of South Korea (bottom) and North Korea (top) stand opposite each other as seen from the border town of Paju, on August 21, 2015 (AFP Photo:Jung Yeon-Je)

Eventually, with Kim Dae-Jung’s presidential successor Roh Moo-Hyun continuing the engagement policy, the loudspeakers on both sides fell silent by mutual consent in 2004.

Seoul had threatened to resume the campaign in 2010 after the sinking of a naval corvette that was blamed on a North Korean submarine.

Although the loudspeakers were re-installed, they were never put back into use as Seoul limited itself to a number of direct FM radio broadcasts into North Korea instead.

But now they are back, blaring out a mixed bag of content from weather reports to snippets of news and messages about democracy.

“South Korea regards propaganda loudspeakers as an effective tool to depress the morale of North Korean troops,” a foreign ministry official told AFP when asked what genuine impact resuming the broadcasts could really have.

Just how depressed the troops might be is open to question. North Korea’s fury at the loudspeakers being switched back on, is not.

Load more